000 | 02973nam a2200361Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1838 | ||
008 | 230305s9999 xx 000 0 und d | ||
020 | _a9781585421398 | ||
040 | _cTBS | ||
041 | _aeng | ||
043 | _aes_ES | ||
050 |
_aHD59.6.U6 _bR35 2002 |
||
100 |
_aRampton, Sheldon _d1957- _921452 _eauthor |
||
245 | 0 |
_aTrust us, we're experts! _b: how industry manipulates science and gambles with your future _c/ Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber. |
|
260 | _aNew York : Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, 2002. | ||
262 | _bPenguin Putnam Inc. | ||
300 | _a360 pages ; 21 cm. | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references (p.321-354) and index. | ||
520 | _aThe authors of Toxic Sludge Is Good for You! unmask the sneaky and widespread methods industry uses to influence opinion through bogus experts, doctored data, and manufactured facts. We count on the experts. We count on them to tell us who to vote for, what to eat, how to raise our children. We watch them on TV, listen to them on the radio, read their opinions in magazine and newspaper articles and letters to the editor. We trust them to tell us what to think, because there’s too much information out there and not enough hours in a day to sort it all out. We should stop trusting them right this second. In their new book Trust Us, We’re Experts!: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future, Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber, authors of Toxic Sludge Is Good For You, offer a chilling exposé on the manufacturing of “independent experts.” Public relations firms and corporations know well how to exploit your trust to get you to buy what they have to sell: Let you hear it from a neutral third party, like a professor or a pediatrician or a soccer mom or a watchdog group. The problem is, these third parties are usually anything but neutral. They have been handpicked, cultivated, and meticulously packaged in order to make you believe what they have to say—preferably in an “objective” format like a news show or a letter to the editor. And in some cases, they have been paid handsomely for their “opinions.” | ||
650 | 0 |
_aIndustrial publicity _xCorrupt practices _zUnited States _98887 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aCorporations _xPublic relations _xCorrupt practices _zUnited States _98888 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPublic relations firms _xCorrupt practices _zUnited States _98889 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aPublic relations consultants _xCorrupt practices _zUnited States _923491 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aExpertise _xCorrupt practices _zUnited States _923492 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aEndorsements in advertising _xCorrupt practices _zUnited States _98890 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aDeceptive advertising _zUnited States _923493 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aRisk perception _zUnited States _98892 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aConsumer protection _zUnited States _98893 |
|
650 | 0 |
_aBusiness ethics _zUnited States _923494 |
|
653 | _aBibliography B3 ELEC - Communicating for Influence | ||
700 |
_aStauber, John _eauthor _921451 |
||
942 | _2lcc | ||
999 |
_c1794 _d1794 |