Trust us, we're experts! : how industry manipulates science and gambles with your future / Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber.

By:

Rampton, Sheldon, 1957- [author]

Contributor(s):

Stauber, John [author]

Material type: Text

TextLanguage: English Publication details: New York : Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam, 2002.Description: 360 pages ; 21 cm.ISBN:

9781585421398

Subject(s): LOC classification:

HD59.6.U6 R35 2002

Summary: The authors of Toxic Sludge Is Good for You! unmask the sneaky and widespread methods industry uses to influence opinion through bogus experts, doctored data, and manufactured facts. We count on the experts. We count on them to tell us who to vote for, what to eat, how to raise our children. We watch them on TV, listen to them on the radio, read their opinions in magazine and newspaper articles and letters to the editor. We trust them to tell us what to think, because there’s too much information out there and not enough hours in a day to sort it all out. We should stop trusting them right this second. In their new book Trust Us, We’re Experts!: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future, Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber, authors of Toxic Sludge Is Good For You, offer a chilling exposé on the manufacturing of “independent experts.” Public relations firms and corporations know well how to exploit your trust to get you to buy what they have to sell: Let you hear it from a neutral third party, like a professor or a pediatrician or a soccer mom or a watchdog group. The problem is, these third parties are usually anything but neutral. They have been handpicked, cultivated, and meticulously packaged in order to make you believe what they have to say—preferably in an “objective” format like a news show or a letter to the editor. And in some cases, they have been paid handsomely for their “opinions.”

Holdings ( 1 )
Title notes ( 2 )

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Recommended bibliography book	TBS Barcelona Libre acceso	HD59.5 RAM (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Available		B01174

Browsing TBS Barcelona shelves, Shelving location: Libre acceso Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	HD58.8 THO Agile people	HD58.8 THO Agile people	HD58.9 MEL Strategic human resource management	HD59.5 RAM Trust us, we're experts! : how industry manipulates science and gambles with your future	HD60 SCH Business and the sustainable development goals : measuring and managing corporate impacts	HD60 SCH Business and the sustainable development goals : measuring and managing corporate impacts	HD60 SCH Business and the sustainable development goals : measuring and managing corporate impacts	Next

Includes bibliographical references (p.321-354) and index.

The authors of Toxic Sludge Is Good for You! unmask the sneaky and widespread methods industry uses to influence opinion through bogus experts, doctored data, and manufactured facts.

We count on the experts. We count on them to tell us who to vote for, what to eat, how to raise our children. We watch them on TV, listen to them on the radio, read their opinions in magazine and newspaper articles and letters to the editor. We trust them to tell us what to think, because there’s too much information out there and not enough hours in a day to sort it all out.

We should stop trusting them right this second.

In their new book Trust Us, We’re Experts!: How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future, Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber, authors of Toxic Sludge Is Good For You, offer a chilling exposé on the manufacturing of “independent experts.”

Public relations firms and corporations know well how to exploit your trust to get you to buy what they have to sell: Let you hear it from a neutral third party, like a professor or a pediatrician or a soccer mom or a watchdog group. The problem is, these third parties are usually anything but neutral. They have been handpicked, cultivated, and meticulously packaged in order to make you believe what they have to say—preferably in an “objective” format like a news show or a letter to the editor. And in some cases, they have been paid handsomely for their “opinions.”